Machine Generated Criticism
When I wrote my previous post, WFPB Black Bean Brownies, I noticed that a WordPress plug-in called JetPack has added a feature to provide “AI Assistant” suggestions. Out of curiosity, I tried it.
Here is what it generated.
My reactions are in red.
The content provides a clear and concise recipe for black bean brownies. Here are a few suggestions to improve it:
1. Consider adding a brief introduction or title to the recipe to make it more engaging for the readers.
The form and style of the feedback is excellent. I like that it made suggestions, rather than just rewriting the post for me. It was generated instantly, so clearly the AI did not bake and taste the brownies before making suggestions. In software development, this is called “static analysis.” This kind of analysis usually generates large lists of possible errors, few of which turn out to actually be errors.
Since my post has both a brief introduction and a title, this suggestion comes through as condescending. I find it interesting that there is no suggestion that I clarify that “WFPB” means “whole food, plant-based.”
2. Include a section on the preparation time and serving size for the recipe.
This seems like a generic suggestion for all recipes, but not really useful for this one.
3. Add headings or bullet points to separate the different sections of the recipe, such as “Ingredients” and “Instructions,” for better readability.
There are headings “Need” and “Do”. Are you stupid?
4. Specify the size of the baking pan needed for the brownies.
What part of 9 x 13 was unclear? If it is the missing units, what units other than inches would you consider?
5. Clarify the step for preparing the pan with vegetable oil. Is it greasing the pan?
You guessed exactly what anyone would guess, so why ask?
6. Provide instructions on how to blend the black beans, water, and vanilla together. Is a blender or food processor needed?
Fascinating that the AI correctly surmised it was to blend the beans, since I accidentally left out the word “beans.” I have since corrected that. Yes, use a blender, unless you have some other way to liquefy beans.
7. Emphasize the importance of not overbaking the brownies to maintain their fudge-like consistency.
The post says “definitely do not overbake”. This suggestion is just parroting, like the early “AI” programs that tried to automate psychoanalysis.
8. Consider including optional toppings or suggestions for serving the brownies.
I did consider these things, but did not say so. I decided against, for brevity and to avoid stating the obvious.
Overall, the content is informative and provides a good foundation for making black bean brownies.
Do you really think so? How do you know?
I tried it again, and got this:
Feedback: The content provides a detailed recipe for black bean brownies, including the ingredients and instructions for preparation. It also mentions that the brownies were a hit at a Halloween gathering.
Again, excellent form and style. Very different output from identical input. Parroting to imitate comprehension.
Actions:
1. Consider adding some introductory sentences to engage the readers and provide context about the brownies and their unique qualities. For example, you could mention that these brownies are a healthier alternative to traditional recipes and surprise people with the secret ingredient.
Redundant.
2. Provide additional information about the texture and taste of the brownies. You mentioned that the consistency is fudge-like, but it would be helpful to describe the taste as well. Is it rich, chocolatey, or slightly tangy due to the black beans?
Are you kidding me about describing the taste? I note the British spelling of “chocolaty.”
3. Include serving suggestions or tips on how to enjoy the brownies. You can mention that they can be served with a scoop of vegan ice cream or paired with a hot cup of coffee.
If I were paid by the word, I might do this. I assume my readers have eaten brownies.
4. Consider including some alternative options or adaptations for readers who may have dietary restrictions or preferences. For example, you could suggest using gluten-free flour or replacing the sugar with a natural sweetener like maple syrup or dates.
This is actually a good suggestion, one I considered. Using dates rather than sugar would be even truer to the concept of “whole food, plant-based.” In the end, I decided to publish the recipe as I actually make it. It is for an occasional treat, not a staple food.
Overall, the content is informative and provides a clear recipe, but adding these suggestions will enhance the reader’s experience and make the content more engaging.
Do you really think so? How do you know?
